Sunday, 11 December 2016

Be Informed: Digital Safety Reflection


As the class progressed into the topic on “Digital Safety,” I have either been reviewed or enlightened on topics ranging from copyright laws to one’s privacy online. As for Team Beta, my group focused on fair user practices and copyright issues; in which, our content can be viewed via video format on Youtube titled, “ED271 Team Beta Prezi”(2016). 

The featured topics, including ours, geared towards culturing the audience into becoming aware of the “Do’s and Don’ts” pertaining to one’s actions while on the web. And looking back to the lessons discussed by each group, I feel each topic was worth looking into; therefore, none that is present should be deleted from the whole. 

This information is essential not just for the educator: various people from different populations of a field down to the students attending grade school should be informed of these issues. The internet is easily-accessible, and this reason alone brings about potential dangers that can affect huge numbers if they are not aware of the consequences of certain actions.   

As a future educator, I feel it is my duty to help spread awareness, starting with my students. When it comes to teaching students about internet safety, I feel introducing them to real-life examples of victims experiencing the wrong-end of the scenario and how unfortunate events turn out will leave a huge impact to their knowledge of the topic. I envision teaching my students by providing various links and videos of the severe scenarios that happened in real-life. I feel this “scare tactic” is what will keep them from attempting to make the wrong move. 

My approach on this matter greatly differs from this class. For this class, we were separated into groups and assigned one topic as our focus. As a means of communication, we did not use Wiggio. Instead, we took advantage of Google Apps the moment we were introduced to it in class. Before, we started out using WhatsApp as our main form of communication in the beginning of the semester. When it came to the next group project, we moved on to our assigned app called, “Oovoo” in order to familiarize ourselves with it and found how not so great the features held in our favor. 

The functionality of Google Apps remains in high regards for our group. In addition, it has been rated as one of the few highly recommended by yours truly in my personal blog (Auberigine Dreams) under the post titled, “Technology Assessment #2” (2016). Google Docs helped us with ease in experiencing real-life changes made to our document, and this served most rewarding in working by the clock. Alongside, we also used Google Hangouts when it came to updating each other on our plans and whenever we made alterations to the shared document. Instant changes lead to faster completion of the product, which allows more time for the group to practice presenting the topic. For this, I highly suggest Google Apps for students in a group project to take advantage of.
  
By assigning each group to become experts on a particular topic and be the sole means of relaying that topic to our classmates serves effective. A number of students may not have the brainpower to hold detail after detail for the various topics revolving around digital safety when they leave this class; however, by holding them responsible to their assigned topic results them to be well-informed and educated to at least that particular foci rather than leaving the course empty-handed. This is why I feel the design of this assignment needs no further alterations.

----------------------------------------------------------
References:

Borja, R., Cruz, K., Dela Cruz, R., & Reyes, S. (Director).(2016).  ED271 Team Beta Prezi [Online video]. Guam: Youtube.Retrieved  
December 11, 2016, from https://www.youtube.com
/watch?v=FpdkBBjcmTY&feature=youtu.be 

Reyes, S. T. (2016, December 10). Technology Assessment #2. In  
Auberigine Dreams. Retrieved December 11, 2016, from       
http://outreyes671.blogspot.com/2016/12/technology-assessment-
2_10.html

Saturday, 10 December 2016

Technology Assessment #2

By taking this class, I have been introduced to numerous tools and their functionality in the classroom. In this section, I put together eight of these tools to my choosing and rated them to their usefulness. The tools featured include Moodle, Chrome, Google Apps, LiveBinders, Teachers.io, Plickers, Kahoot.it, and Ydraw.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratings go by the following:
Unsatisfactory
Satisfactory
Highly Recommended

https://moodle.org/logo/moodle-logo.png 
 ~ Satisfactory ~
Learning platform that allows educators to host classroom sessions online and an abundance of other features
Pros
Cons
  • emails student whenever they submit on Moodle (act as receipt)
  • access assignments, handouts, videos, links, etc. uploaded by the teacher
  • able to conduct quizzes/tests
  • able to host online chats 
  • submission issue (some students think they are done clicking one submit button and end up not submitting overall)
  • teachers need to assign due date to assignments in order for it to be graded
  • "Fill in the blank questions for quizzes allow limited, correct terms and penalize student if input otherwise
  • times out if left idle during session
  • not as compatible with Chrome
  • requires internet access
  http://logok.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Chrome-Logo-wordmark.png
~ Satisfactory ~
Web browser (created by Google)

 Pros
Cons
  • easy to use
  • adequate internet speed
  • satisfactory security
  • not recommended to use for Moodle
  • takes up storage
  • lack of add-ons
  • requires internet access

http://iosicongallery.com/img/512/google-2015.png http://icons.iconarchive.com/icons/alecive/flatwoken/512/Apps-Google-Chrome-App-List-icon.png

~ Highly Recommended ~
Applications available by Google that includes Gmail, Docs, Blog, etc.
 Pros
Cons
  • can create documents, presentations, etc like Microsoft free-of-charge
  • can share with others and make changes in real-time
  • online storage
  • saves changes frequently
  • requires gmail account
  • requires internet access
  http://evscicats.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Live_Binders2.jpg
~ Satisfactory ~
Online binder
 Pros
 Cons
  • free-of-charge
  • organizes sites
  • easily-accesible
  • online storage
  • trouble inserting pictures besides offered in Flickrs
  • some sites only show up as a link in tab
http://is2.mzstatic.com/image/thumb/Purple5/v4/0b/b3/f5/0bb3f571-a602-ea0c-0c5b-2ebf259f7451/source/512x512bb.jpg
https://teachers.io/
~ Satisfactory ~
Planner for teachers
 Pros
Cons
  • works well with student version called, "MyHomework"
  • can be accessed on website if student/parent doesn't have "MyHomework" app
  • free-of-charge
  • requires internet access
http://essd40pd.weebly.com/uploads/6/8/7/0/6870306/5950759.png?1396448567
 ~ Highly Recommended ~
Assistive technological tool for teachers
 Pros
Cons
  • student doesn't need to log into anything to input answers
  • acquires answers with ease
  • fast assessment
  • free-of-charge
  • requires cards with answers (shouldn't be laminated)


http://barronbearstechnology.pbworks.com/f/1423165320/Kahoot%20logo6.gif
~ Highly Recommended ~
Game-oriented learning platform
 Pros
 Cons
  • students can answer questions using personal devices
  • engaging
  • free-of charge
  • internet lag will tamper results
  • requires internet access


https://ydraw.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/Ydraw-Logo-and-Slogan-dark.png
~ Satisfactory ~
Company aiming to create artistic video content by request of others
 Pros
 Cons
  • eye-catching
  • creative
  • visually-aesthetic
  • offers different art styles
  • excellent quality
  • does not require internet access to play video
  • expensive
  • takes time for product to be finished